The allegations against former broker Jeffrey Thomas Higgins are not just about one advisor’s misconduct. They raise a more important question for investors:

How can an alleged misappropriation scheme continue for nearly 17 years within regulated brokerage environments?

Higgins, who was associated with Western International Securities and Financial West Group, has been charged by federal prosecutors and sued by regulators in connection with an alleged long-running scheme involving unauthorized sales of client securities and the diversion of funds for personal use.

While the allegations themselves are serious, the broader implications are where investors should focus.

Lesson 1: Time Is a Signal, Not Just a Detail

A scheme that allegedly spans from 2007 through 2024 is not simply a matter of isolated misconduct. Duration at this scale often indicates that activity was repeated across multiple accounts and that opportunities for detection existed over many years. In securities litigation, long-term fraud frequently shifts the focus toward supervisory breakdowns, not just individual actions.

Lesson 2: Misappropriation Cases Often Hide in Plain Sight

Unlike complex investment strategies, misappropriation is often operational. In the Higgins matter, prosecutors allege that clients were told their funds were being used to purchase discounted securities. This type of representation can delay detection by creating a narrative that appears both plausible and advantageous, while funds are allegedly moved out of client accounts through unauthorized liquidations.

Lesson 3: “Too Good to Verify” Is a Recurring Pattern

The alleged use of “exclusive” or discounted investment opportunities highlights a recurring structure seen in many enforcement actions: perceived insider access and limited-time framing. This creates a reduced likelihood that clients will independently verify transactions—a repeatable behavioral pattern in financial fraud.

Lesson 4: Multiple Firms Can Mean Expanded Exposure

Higgins’ associations with both Western International Securities and Financial West Group are significant. Each firm had independent supervisory obligations and a duty to investigate irregularities. When alleged misconduct spans multiple firms, it can expand the scope of potential accountability for the institutions involved.

Lesson 5: Regulatory Actions Signal More Than Just Enforcement

The involvement of the DOJ, SEC, and FINRA reflects the severity of the allegations. For investors, these parallel actions can validate patterns of misconduct and provide critical documentation that strengthens claims in recovery proceedings.

What This Means for Investors

Sonn Law Group continues to monitor developments in the Higgins matter and is reviewing potential claims on behalf of affected investors. Claims are typically pursued through FINRA arbitration, where investors may seek recovery tied to unauthorized trading, misappropriation, or failures in oversight.

Sonn Law Group is investigating claims regarding Joel Eziekel Blum (CRD #4905379, Goshen, New York). Blum recently submitted an AWC in which he was fined $10,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for 20 days. See FINRA Case #2014040186601. Blum was associated with Merrill Lynch from May 2008 until his termination in February 2014. Blum has been associated with Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., since February 2014. The Form U-5 filed by Merrill Lynch to terminate Blum's registration states that he was discharged for "conduct including failure to contact clients in advance of entering orders in non-discretionary accounts and mismarking order tickets as unsolicited." FINRA found that Blum executed discretionary transactions in customer accounts without written authorization to do so. In addition, Blum mismarked order tickets in connection with these transactions, inaccurately indicating that the trades were unsolicited, according to FINRA. In entering into the AWC, Blum neither admitted or denied FINRA's findings. Pursuant to FINRA Rules, member firms are responsible for supervising a broker's activities during the time the broker is registered with the firm. Therefore, Ameriprise or Merrill Lynch may be liable for investment or other losses suffered by Blum's customers. If you were a client of Ameriprise, Merrill Lynch, or Blum, and have suffered investment losses or financial irregularities, please contact Sonn Law Group to explore your legal options. Sonn Law Group is a nationally recognized law firm representing individuals, trusts, corporations and institutions in claims against brokerage firms, banks and insurance companies. To learn more, please call us at 844-689-5754 or complete our "contact form."
Table of content
Related articles