Diana M. Leon, an Osaic Wealth broker and investment adviser representative, is the subject of customer dispute disclosures reported on her FINRA BrokerCheck profile.

According to FINRA BrokerCheck, Leon is currently registered with Osaic Wealth, Inc. Her BrokerCheck report lists 3 customer dispute disclosures and 1 termination disclosure.

Official sources: FINRA BrokerCheck profile for Diana M. Leon (https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/4857407); FINRA BrokerCheck report PDF (https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4857407.pdf)

Leon has been registered with Osaic Wealth, Inc. as a broker since January 2024 and as an investment adviser representative since January 2024. Her BrokerCheck report also lists prior registrations with Woodbury Financial Services, LPL Financial, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo Advisors, Morgan Stanley, and UBS Financial Services.

Pending Customer Disputes

FINRA BrokerCheck reports two pending customer disputes involving Woodbury Financial Services and Osaic Wealth.

In one pending FINRA arbitration, claimants allege that unnamed structured note investments recommended by Leon were not in keeping with the clients’ needs and objectives and/or were not fully explained to them. The product type is listed as structured note. Alleged damages are not specified. The matter is reported as FINRA arbitration docket number 26-00075.

In another pending FINRA arbitration, a customer alleges that a structured note recommended by Leon was not in keeping with the client’s needs and objectives and/or that the investment was not fully explained to the client. The product type is listed as structured note. Alleged damages are not specified. The matter is reported as FINRA arbitration docket number 26-00076.

Prior Denied Customer Dispute

FINRA BrokerCheck also reports a prior denied customer dispute involving Osaic Wealth.

The customer alleged that callable note purchases were not in keeping with her needs and objectives. The product type is listed as structured note. Alleged damages were listed as $5,000, with the explanation that the claim sought a “return” of the original investment of $50,000.

According to BrokerCheck, the matter was denied. The broker statement included in the report states that the customer initiated an arbitration claim after the firm denied the complaint as being without merit.

Termination Disclosure

FINRA BrokerCheck reports a termination disclosure involving Merrill Lynch.

The termination type is listed as discharged. According to the disclosure, Merrill Lynch alleged conduct involving inaccurate entries of required account reviews in an internal tracking system.

The broker statement included in the BrokerCheck report disputes the allegations and states that Leon scheduled and held account review meetings with clients on a regular basis.

Why These Disclosures Matter

The customer disputes reported on Leon’s BrokerCheck profile involve structured notes and callable notes.

Structured notes can be complex investment products. Depending on their terms, they may involve market risk, issuer credit risk, limited liquidity, call features, capped upside, downside exposure, and performance conditions that may be difficult for investors to evaluate without a clear explanation.

Callable notes can add another layer of complexity because the issuer may have the ability to redeem the note early under certain conditions. That feature can affect income expectations, reinvestment risk, downside exposure, and the investor’s ability to hold the product for the anticipated term.

When customer disputes allege that structured notes were not consistent with a client’s needs and objectives or were not fully explained, the review often focuses on the investor’s risk tolerance, age, liquidity needs, investment objectives, experience with complex products, and the disclosures provided at the time of recommendation.

Important Note for Investors

The allegations reported in FINRA BrokerCheck are allegations only unless and until they are resolved through a final regulatory, civil, arbitration, or court determination. Pending customer disputes have not been proven, and denied matters may be closed without any finding of wrongdoing.

However, investors who suffered losses in structured notes, callable notes, market-linked notes, or other complex investment products recommended through Osaic Wealth, Woodbury Financial Services, or a related financial professional may wish to review their account records and speak with an investment loss recovery attorney.

Sonn Law Group represents investors in claims involving unsuitable investments, structured note losses, callable note losses, complex product losses, broker misconduct, misrepresentation, and failure-to-supervise claims.

Investors who suffered losses involving structured notes or other complex investment products may contact Sonn Law Group to discuss potential recovery options.