Recovering From Conservation Easement Losses

A male legal professional wearing glasses, sitting at a desk and reviewing documents with a female client in an office setting.

Conservation easement investments, often marketed as a way to preserve land and secure valuable tax deductions, have become a legal minefield for many investors. As the IRS cracks down on syndicated conservation easement transactions, numerous investors are facing disallowed tax deductions, audits and significant financial penalties. For those affected, recovering from these losses can be an overwhelming process.

Sonn Law Group, a nationally recognized leader in investment fraud cases, specializes in helping investors recover from these complex financial setbacks. With extensive experience representing clients nationwide, our attorneys are well-versed in the intricacies of syndicated conservation easement transactions. They’re committed to providing expert legal support to those impacted by these problematic investments.

What Are Conservation Easements?

Conservation easements are legal agreements that protect land by limiting future development while allowing the landowner to retain certain property rights. These agreements are used to preserve the land’s ecological, scenic or historic value, often in partnership with land trusts or conservation organizations. By placing land under a conservation easement, property owners can ensure the land remains protected for future generations while benefiting from its use in approved ways, such as for agriculture or recreation.

Land trusts and landowners often collaborate to:

The primary incentive for landowners and investors to participate in conservation easements is the potential for tax benefits. These include:

While these tax advantages are a significant draw for investors, syndicated conservation easement transactions — where groups of investors pool resources to buy land and claim deductions — have come under increased scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). These transactions, often flagged for inflated appraisals and improper tax filings, can lead to audits, disallowed deductions and severe financial penalties for investors.

However, the IRS closely scrutinizes these transactions, and only properly valued easements are eligible for deductions, making professional guidance essential.

Two individuals signing legal documents at a desk, with law books and a scale of justice visible in the background.

Syndicated Conservation Easements: Risks and IRS Scrutiny

Syndicated conservation easements have become a focal point of IRS scrutiny due to their potential for abuse as tax avoidance schemes. Unlike traditional conservation easements, which focus on preserving land, syndicated easements involve groups of investors pooling resources to purchase property with the primary goal of obtaining tax benefits. Once the conservation easement is placed on the property, investors claim a charitable tax deduction based on its appraised value, often leading to deductions far exceeding their initial investment.

In a typical syndicated deal, a promoter creates a legal entity, such as a partnership, to acquire the land. Investors are then brought in to purchase shares in this entity. After placing the conservation easement on the property, an appraiser assigns a value to the easement — often significantly inflated compared to the purchase price of the land. Investors claim tax deductions proportional to their share of the appraised value, which can sometimes be multiple times their original investment.These transactions have drawn significant regulatory attention. The IRS, along with the Senate Finance Committee, has flagged syndicated conservation easements as potentially abusive tax shelters for several reasons:

In response to these issues, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, which generally denies deductions for syndicated conservation easements where the claimed deduction exceeds 2.5 times the initial investment.

While syndicated conservation easements may seem attractive for their potential tax benefits, they carry substantial risks. Investors should carefully consider the possible financial repercussions and consult qualified tax professionals to ensure compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.

Understanding the Consequences of Unsuitable Syndicated Conservation Easements

Some real estate brokers and financial advisors have recommended syndicated conservation easement investments without fully disclosing the associated risks. These investments were often presented as low-risk ways to secure significant tax deductions, but many investors were unaware of the financial risks tied to IRS challenges. Unscrupulous advisors failed to conduct proper due diligence or fully explain the potential repercussions, leaving investors vulnerable to serious financial consequences.

The IRS has been actively challenging the tax deductions claimed in many of these syndicated conservation easement transactions. The agency’s primary focus has been on disallowing deductions due to inflated appraisals and improper filings. As a result:

Beyond the immediate loss of anticipated tax benefits, investors are often hit with additional costs:

The financial burden can be overwhelming for investors misled into these unsuitable syndicated conservation easement investments. The combination of back taxes, penalties and audit-related costs often far exceeds the value of the initial investment, making it essential for affected individuals to seek legal recourse.

A female lawyer speaks to a judge in a courtroom, with attendees seated in the background and another lawyer standing beside her holding documents.

Legal Recovery Options for Conservation Easement Losses

Investors who have suffered financial losses due to unsuitable or fraudulent syndicated conservation easement investments have several legal options for recovery. These options are designed to hold brokers and financial advisors accountable for failing to conduct adequate due diligence or misrepresenting the nature of these transactions.

Investors have the right to seek compensation through:

Sonn Law Group has successfully represented numerous clients who suffered from unsuitable syndicated conservation easement investments. Our attorneys leverage their securities law expertise to navigate these cases’ complexities. We have recovered substantial losses for clients in cases where brokers or financial advisors failed to conduct adequate due diligence or misrepresented the investments. Whether through arbitration, litigation or settlement negotiations, Sonn Law Group’s proven track record speaks for itself.

How Sonn Law Group Can Help

Dealing with conservation easement losses can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone — Sonn Law Group is here to help. Our team specializes in evaluating the suitability of these investments, filing legal claims through FINRA arbitration or litigation, and assisting clients with IRS audits related to disallowed deductions and penalties. We have extensive experience holding brokers and advisors accountable for failing to properly assess or disclose risks, and we work to ensure that investors receive the compensation they deserve.

With a national presence and extensive experience in investment fraud cases, Sonn Law Group is well-positioned to handle your case. Contact us today for a free consultation to explore your legal options and start the process of recovering your losses.

CONTACT US FOR A FREE CONSULTATION

Se Habla Español

Contact our office today to discuss your case. You can reach us by phone at 844-689-5754 or via e-mail. To send us an e-mail, simply complete and submit the online form below.