FINRA Supervision rules and regulationsWhen you hire a financial advisor, you have the reasonable expectation that you will be able to rely on their advice.

Unfortunately, financial advisor negligence and fraud do sometimes happen.

Your brokerage firm has a legal responsibility to put a proper supervisory system in place to protect you from financial advisor misconduct.

Indeed, the duty to supervise is one of the key components of securities regulation in the United States. Under federal law, most notably, Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, brokerage firms are responsible for supervising their securities representatives.

Further, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has also enacted rules that put the onus on firms to be proactive in preventing, detecting, and stopping misconduct.

At Sonn Law Group, our securities fraud lawyers are committed to fighting for the rights and interests of investors across the nation. We want all investors to have a basic understanding of the duties that their brokerage firm owes to them.

For immediate assistance, please don’t hesitate to call our firm at (844) 689-5754 or send an online message today for a free consultation.

Here, we have put together a brief guide that explains FINRA’s supervisory requirements.

The FINRA Rules on Supervision

FINRA Rule 3110: The General Supervision Requirement

FINRA Rule 3110 is the general supervision requirement.

This rule requires registered brokerage firms to establish and maintain a reasonably well-crafted system to supervise the activities of individual representatives so as to ensure compliance with securities laws and industry regulations.

Under FINRA rule 3110, brokerage firms must have written supervisory procedures (WSPs) in place.

Collectively, a firm’s WSPs should address the supervision of:

  • Transactions;
  • Correspondence with customers;
  • Internal communications; and
  • Customer complaints.

Additionally, in order to satisfy FINRA’s 3110 rule, a firm’s WSPs must clearly describe which individuals will be responsible for ensuring compliance, what exactly each individual will do, and how they will document their work.

Written supervisory procedures should be individually tailored by each firm in order to meet their unique circumstances.

FINRA Rule 3120: Testing the System

FINRA Rule 3120 requires that all registered brokerage firms have an effective system of supervisory control policies and procedures (SCPs). Essentially, rule 3120 mandates that brokers must ‘test’ their own WSP system on a regular basis.

At least once per year, brokerage firms are required to test and verify that their current written supervisory procedures are adequate to ensure compliance with securities regulations.

Further, senior management at a firm should receive a Rule 3120 report from the compliance department once per year.

FINRA Rule 3130: Annual Certification

FINRA Rule 3130 requires the top-ranking executives at a firm to certify that their WSPs and SCPs are in compliance with securities industry regulations. Specifically, a brokerage firm’s CCO and CEO are responsible for approving such a certification.

The general purpose of FINRA Rule 3130 is to ensure that brokerage firm compliance staff are clearly communicating any issues with the actual business managers. The compliance department’s findings should be put into action and any ‘gaps’ in the supervisory system need to be addressed without delay.

Victim of a brokerage firm’s misconduct? Submit the short form below to schedule a free consultation today.

Sorry. This form is no longer accepting new submissions.

Failure to Supervise Claims

If you lost money due to the negligence or fraud of your financial advisor, you may have a valid failure to supervise claim against your brokerage firm. If your brokerage firm failed to follow any FINRA rules or regulations, the firm may legally liable for your losses.

Failure to supervise claims come in a variety of different forms.

Some of the most common examples include:

  • Inadequate pre-hire screening practices;
  • Inadequate training of securities representatives;
  • Failure to effectively monitor the communications of individual brokers;
  • Failure to effectively monitor customer transactions;
  • Lack of sufficient reviews and inspections;
  • Failure to put appropriate written supervisory procedures in place;
  • Failure to follow up on suspected misconduct; and
  • Failure to report certain transactions.

When brokerages firms fail to properly supervise their financial advisors, innocent investors are put at serious risk. Negligent supervision can lead to a variety of FINRA violations. For example, an unsupervised investment advisor may make unsuitable investment recommendations or engage in unauthorized trading.

In many cases, financial advisor misconduct is allowed to persist because of poor oversight. Investors deserve protection from their brokerage firm. If you believe that your broker-dealer failed to properly supervise its securities representatives, please consult with an experienced attorney.

Contact Our Broker Negligence Attorneys Today

At Sonn Law Group, our FINRA arbitration lawyers have extensive experience handling failure to supervise claims. If you believe that you lost money because of your brokerage firm’s failure to supervise its representatives, we can help.

To set up your free claim evaluation, please call us today at (844) 689-5754 or contact us directly through our website.

Sonn Law Group is investigating claims regarding Joel Eziekel Blum (CRD #4905379, Goshen, New York). Blum recently submitted an AWC in which he was fined $10,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for 20 days. See FINRA Case #2014040186601. Blum was associated with Merrill Lynch from May 2008 until his termination in February 2014. Blum has been associated with Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., since February 2014. The Form U-5 filed by Merrill Lynch to terminate Blum's registration states that he was discharged for "conduct including failure to contact clients in advance of entering orders in non-discretionary accounts and mismarking order tickets as unsolicited." FINRA found that Blum executed discretionary transactions in customer accounts without written authorization to do so. In addition, Blum mismarked order tickets in connection with these transactions, inaccurately indicating that the trades were unsolicited, according to FINRA. In entering into the AWC, Blum neither admitted or denied FINRA's findings. Pursuant to FINRA Rules, member firms are responsible for supervising a broker's activities during the time the broker is registered with the firm. Therefore, Ameriprise or Merrill Lynch may be liable for investment or other losses suffered by Blum's customers. If you were a client of Ameriprise, Merrill Lynch, or Blum, and have suffered investment losses or financial irregularities, please contact Sonn Law Group to explore your legal options. Sonn Law Group is a nationally recognized law firm representing individuals, trusts, corporations and institutions in claims against brokerage firms, banks and insurance companies. To learn more, please call us at 844-689-5754 or complete our "contact form."
Table of content
Related articles